Liquor privatization effort shelved this year

, Posted: Wed, June 4 2014 at 6:36 PM, Updated: Wed, June 4 2014 at 6:40 PM

Salem, Ore. -- (Pamplin Media Group) Advocates announced Wednesday they will abandon their effort to end the state monopoly on liquor sales in Oregon.

Although they had an already-approved version for circulation among voters, advocates said they ran into delays in getting approval to proceed with a preferred revision. The Supreme Court issued a decision last week on a ballot title, the official summary of a measure, but it still awaited approval for circulation.

July 3 is the deadline for filing signatures for initiatives for the Nov. 4 ballot. The measure would have required 87,213 valid signatures.

But a chief sponsor said advocates aren't giving up on the effort to get the state out of retail liquor sales, which it has controlled since the end of Prohibition in 1933.

"We still believe Oregonians are ready to end our state's Prohibition-era monopoly on liquor sales and allow Oregon consumers to buy liquor at qualified grocery and retail stores — just like consumers do in most other states," said Lynn Gust, division president of retailer Fred Meyer.

Oregon is one of 18 states where liquor sales remain in state hands. Washington state voters approved a privatization measure in 2011.

The other sponsor was Lauren Johnson, chief executive of Newport Avenue Market in Bend, who said the state should concentrate on education, compliance and enforcement of liquor laws.

The initiative would have drawn opposition from an array of groups.

The Oregon Liquor Control Commission had prepared a plan for "modernization," under which the state would continue to own liquor stocks but allow retail sales by stores larger than 10,000 square feet. But lawmakers did not advance it in their 2014 session.

"As we have in the past, this is a dialogue that continues with policy-makers, including legislators," said Pat McCormick, a spokesman for Oregonians for Competition. "But if we are not successful in achieving privatization through the legislative process, we will be back in 2016."

Copyright Pamplin Media Group. All rights reserved unless otherwise stated. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without written permission.

What do you think? Sound off on our Facebook page and on Twitter, or leave a comment below.

Leave a Comment:

Note: Comments with profanity are automatically filtered and hidden. Verbal attacks towards others via our comments section will not be tolerated.